Total Records Found: 1360 |  Showing: 315-329, ordered by most recent first

<< Previous | Next >>


Name: Famed dramatist, Arthur Miller, censored and attacked for allegedly criticizing McCarthyism   [ Edit ]

Date: 1951 - 1975

Location: North America

Subject: Political/Economic/Social Opinion

Medium: Theatre ,Literature

Artist: Arthur Miller (1915 - 2005): US dramatist

Confronting Bodies: US government under the Truman administration and particularly Republican senator from Wisconsin, Joseph R. McCarthy

Date of Action: 1950s and 1960s

Specific Location: United States

Description of Artwork: "Death of a Salesman" (1949) and "The Crucible" (1953) were Arthur Miller's most controversial plays. In "Death of a Salesman" the character Willy Loman challenges the idea of "the American dream". In this play, Loman is fired from his job of 30 years as a traveling; and, ultimately, unable to fulfill his dreams, Loman commits suicide. "The Crucible" is a portrayal of the Salem Witch Trials of 1692. The play focuses on John Proctor, who is falsely accuses and condemned of witchcraft. Offered amnesty if he will name other witches, but, Proctor refuses and is put to death.



Description of Incident: US critics attacked "Death of a Salesman" as Marxist for its implied critique of capitalism and materialism (ironically, Soviets criticized the play as not being Marxist enough). And, critics objected to "The Crucible" on the basis that it suggested a parallel between the hysteria surrounding the Salem witch hunt and the McCarthyism that dominated the current era. The US government objected to Miller's pro-communism message. In 1954, the Belgo-America Association, a business group, invited Miller to the European premiere of "The Crucible" in Brussels. However, his application for a passport renewal was turned down by the chief of the US passport division as being "not in the national interest". Then, in June 1956, Miller was called to testify before the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) concerning unauthorized use of passports. Aware that he had attended a few meetings of communist writers, HUAC ordered Miller to name the meetings' attendees but Miller refused.



Results of Incident: In 1957 Miller was convicted of contempt of Congress, fined $500, and given a suspended 30-day jail sentence. On appeal the next year, the citation was reversed. In 1965, Miller was elected president of PEN, the international literary organization that provides a forum for expressing views and fighting government repression.



Source: Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Ed. Derek Jones. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001.

Submitted By: NCAC

Date Input: Thursday, August 9, 2007

Date Edited


Name: Joseph Stalin orders the murder of famed Yiddish actor and director, Solomon Mikhoels   [ Edit ]

Date: 1926 - 1950

Location: Europe

Subject: Political/Economic/Social Opinion ,Religious

Medium: Dance ,Personal Opinion ,Public Speech

Artist: Solomon Mikhoels (1890 - 1948): Russian and Yiddish actor and theater director

Confronting Bodies: The Soviet Union government, Joseph Stalin

Date of Action: 1930s - 1940s

Specific Location: The Soviet Union

Description of Artwork: Solomon Mikhoels, a Russian actor and theater director, was the director of Moscow's State Jewish Theater and chairman of the Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee (JAFC). His artistic work often focused on the plight of the Jews directly before, during, and after World War II. Under Mikhoels the JAFC played a prominent role in Soviet propaganda efforts against Hitler during World War II.



Description of Incident: After the war, Mikhoels's theater performed a number of plays depicting Jewish heroism during the war. However, he was not permitted to single out Jews as Nazi victims, and was forced to downplay the anti-Semitism that the war had ignited within the Soviet Union. During this time, Mikhoels also worked with the JAFC to help rebuild Jewish life in the Soviet Union. But, the Soviet state no longer needed to attract the support of western Jews. And, with the onset of the Cold War and the impending creation of Israel, Mikhoels's outspoken defense of Jewish national interests disturbed the Soviet authorities. Mikhoels spoke in favor of the establishment of a Jewish state at a public ceremony; however, the next day, when the ceremony was to broadcast on the radio,Mikhoels's speech was removed.



Results of Incident: On January 13, 1948, Mikhoels was killed after being run over by a truck. While Mikhoels's death was portrayed as a tragic accident, it was in fact arranged by the Ministry of State Security, acting on direct orders from Stalin. Furthermore, in 1949, the state began attacking Mikhoels's legacy by burning his archives, removing his scenes from popular films, and disbanding his theater. Publication of a collection of his writings became possible during the "Thaw" of the late 1950s, and in 1989 the Mikhoels Jewish Cultural Centre was established in Moscow. An official commemoration of the 50th anniversary of his murder was held in 1998.



Source: Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Ed. Derek Jones. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001.

Submitted By: NCAC

Date Input: Thursday, August 9, 2007

Date Edited


Name: Television show, "Power Rangers", censored in several countries   [ Edit ]

Date: 1985 - 1995

Location: North America ,Australia

Subject: Other

Medium: Television

image description
Artist: "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers" television show

Confronting Bodies: Canadian government and New Zealand government

Date of Action: 1994

Specific Location: Canada and New Zealand

Description of Artwork: "Power Rangers" is a television show aimed at 9 - to 12 - year-olds. The show features six teenagers, four boys and two girls, who morph into superheroes. The superheroes are either ninja fighters or robotic dinosaurs, who protect Earth from Godzilla-like monsters sent by Rita Repula (also referred to as "the evil Lord Zed").



Description of Incident: Power Rangers has been shown in approximately 30 countries world wide, with little controversy. However, in 1994 the program was declared too violent for Canadian television and pulled from screening on several free-to-air channels, although Canadians with cable continued to receive the show through Fox network. Some Scandinavian countries also dropped the program. The most notable controversy surrounding Power Rangers took place in New Zealand. The show first aired on New Zealands free-to-air television channel during the months of May and July of 1994. During this period, four formal complaints about Power Rangers were referred to the Broadcasting Standards Authority (BSA). Two of the complaints came from parents and teachers of kindergarteners. One was from the Children's Media Watch, a lobby concerned with children's TV programming, and another came from the mother of young children. The BSA also received a large number of informal written and telephone complaints about the series. The complaints focused on the Power Rangers' use of violence as a means of resolving conflict, and the negative impact of the show on the behavior of children, particularly preschoolers, who were intimidating the martial arts actions. Against the complaints, the broadcaster, Television New Zealand (TVNZ) argued that the series empowered children, offering positive role models and demonstrating values such as self-esteem, courage, responsibility and teamwork. The complainants were not satisfied with TVNZ's defense of the show, and the BSA now became more closely involved. After considering the complaints, the BSA decided in favor of the complainants  stating the show was in fact too violent.



Results of Incident: While the BSA does not have the power to direct the broadcasters or ban television shows, their verdict in the matter was influential. The decision made by the BSA resulted in TVNZ canceling the Power Ranger's show from the channel's regular line-up.



Source: Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Ed. Derek Jones. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001.

Submitted By: NCAC

Date Input: Thursday, August 9, 2007

Date Edited


Name: Anti-Spain play banned after Spain threats to sevar all relations with England   [ Edit ]

Date: 1951 - 1975

Location: Europe

Subject: Political/Economic/Social Opinion

Medium: Theatre ,Literature

Artist: Thomas Middleton (1580 - 1627): English dramatist

Confronting Bodies: The Spanish Government and the Spanish Royal Family; the British Royal Family

Date of Action: 1623-1624

Specific Location: London, England

Description of Artwork: Thomas Middleton's play, "A Game at Chess" is a thinly disguised allegory of the failed marriage alliance between the thrones of England/Scotland and Spain in 1623. The play examined the real-life drama surrounding the impending marriage of the heir to the thrownes, prince Charles and, the Spanish princess Donna Maria. James I wanted a Spanish match for his son, as it would result in an important alliance and trade advantages with the New World. In exchange, the Spanish insisted upon the suspension of penal laws against Catholics in England. Ultimately, the marriage fell through after Spain refused to promise extensive military aid to England. In "A Game at Chess", the "Black House" (Spain) seeks to corrupt members of the "White House" through the use of romantic relationships. In the play, members of the "Black House" are portrayed in unflattering ways while characters in the "White House" are presented in a sympathetic manner. In the end, the "White House" exposes the corruption of the "Black House".



Description of Incident: During the 1600s tradition held that it was forbidden to portray on stage living monarchs in an unfavorable manner. However, the British government granted Middleton permission to perform his play. In August of 1624, the play premiered in London and was an immediate success. However, the Spanish ambassador angerly informed King James I that the play presented an unfair anti-Spanish feeling to such a degree that he no longer felt safe living in London. The ambassador demanded that the actors be punished, or else the kind should be prepared for severances of all relations between Spain and England.



Results of Incident: Due to Spain's threats, King James called for the actors and Middleton to appear before him to discuss the matter. The actors appeared and were told that they were forbidden to perform. Failing to appear, a warrant was put out for Middleton's arrest. When he could not be found, his 20-year-old son, Edward, was brought in for questioning but was unwilling to provide information about his father. When Middleton finally did resurface, he spent some time in Fleet Prison awaiting formal pardon by the king. The length and circumstances of his imprisonment are unknown, but it is thought that he was released. No further performances of the play were allowed.



Source: Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Ed. Derek Jones. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001.

Submitted By: NCAC

Date Input: Thursday, August 9, 2007

Date Edited


Name: French historian, Jules Michelet, censored by the Roman Church   [ Edit ]

Date: 1975 - 1984

Location: Europe

Subject: Religious

Medium: Print Journalism ,Personal Opinion

Artist: Jules Michelet (1798 - 1874): French historian

Confronting Bodies: The Roman Church

Date of Action: 1839 - 1966

Specific Location: France

Description of Artwork: In many of Jules Michelet's journals and books he attacked the ethics of Christian doctrines and beliefs. In his book, "Du Pretre, de la femme, de la famille" (trans. "The Priesthood, Women, and the Family"), which was published in 1845, Michelet attacked the power of priesthood. In particular, Michelet asserts that priests with no personal experience of marriage presumed to tell women in particular how to act towards their husbands and family. Later in his life Michelet took particular aim at the Jesuit faith arguing that Jesuits were the enemies of liberty and enlightenment.



Description of Incident: His 1845 book that attacked the Roman Church was censored by the church who saw it as a threat. Believing the book compromised the church's position in society, the Roman Church promptly put the text on the "Index Librorum Prohibitorum". In 1848 Michelet was suspended from his teaching position at the College de France for his outspoken attacks against the Jesuit faith. Then, in 1849, he returned to his teaching position, however, French government agents posing as students attended his lectures and staged riots. Michelet was finally dismissed for good by Louis Napoleon in 1851.



Results of Incident: Michelet continued to write and express his views. In 1858 he wrote "L'Amour" (Love), in which he contrasted the love and morality which existed in ordinary families with their absence in the institutional Church. Despite the work being censored and placed on the "Index", it became extremely popular among the reading public. Before his death in 1874 Michelet wrote additional works all of which were placed on the "Index" until it was abolished in 1966.



Source: Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Ed. Derek Jones. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001.

Submitted By: NCAC

Date Input: Thursday, August 9, 2007

Date Edited


Name: Russian theater director, Vsevolod Meyerhold, censored and ultimately murdered for the political context of his plays   [ Edit ]

Date: 1851 - 1899 ,1975 - 1984

Location: Europe

Subject: Political/Economic/Social Opinion

Medium: Theatre

Artist: Vsevolod Meyerhold (1874 - 1940): Russian theater director

Confronting Bodies: Russian/Soviet Union government under Joseph Stalin and the French government

Date of Action: Late 1870s - early 1940s

Specific Location: The Soviet Union (particularly Russia) and France

Description of Artwork: For Meyerhold's entire career as a theater director he faced censorship and bans on almost every one of his projects.



Description of Incident: After years of censorship and bans on his plays, in the 1930's Meyerhold was finally given permission to take his theater company on tour to Germany and France. Despite being granted permission to perform, his works continued to be criticized, banned and attacked. In Paris, Meyerhold's two works about revolution - Tretiakov's "Roar, China!" and Ilia Selvinskii's "The Second Army Commander" - were banned by the French government. And, his reworking of Gogol's "The Government Inspector" provoked angry demonstrations from the Russian people. Then, when Meyerhold applied to the Soviet authorities for permission to take his company on a tour of the United States, he was rejected.



Results of Incident: By the 1930's he was hated by the Soviet country and the object of attack. In 1938, his wife and star actress, Zinaida Raikh, was stabbed to death through the eyes by unknown but probably officially approved government assailants. Then, in 1940, Meyerhold was shot and killed. Today, many claim his influence remains the invisible underpinning of western theater.



Source: Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Ed. Derek Jones. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001.

Submitted By: NCAC

Date Input: Thursday, August 9, 2007

Date Edited: Thursday, August 9, 2007


Name: Jiri Menzel's "Skylarks on a String"   [ Edit ]

Date: 1951 - 1975

Location: Russia and Central Asia

Subject: Political/Economic/Social Opinion

Medium: Film Video

image description
Artist: Jiri Menzel (director) and Bohumil Hrabal (writer)

Confronting Bodies: Communist Party officials

Date of Action: 1969

Specific Location: Czech Republic

Description of Artwork: "Skylarks on a String" makes a clear attack on Stalinism and is Menzel's first film written after the Warsaw Pact invasion. It takes place on a steel reprocessing plant where members of the bourgeoisie have been sent for re-education. The characters are all enemies of the state, such as a saxophonist (whose instrument is too bourgeois), a Seventh day Adventist (Who can't work on Saturdays), and a dairyman (Who gave up his dairy to work for Socialism). It constantly juxtaposes the romantic vision of socialism with the true state of it. For example, a union representative arrives, driven by a chauffer, and immediately puts on a workman's hat to get into character. The film has been criticized for it's use of humor when dealing with so serious an issue, but it does not avoid reality at all and rather uses humor to face it.



Description of Incident: Even though Menzel and Hrabal were a powerful filmmaking team at the time and had won an Academy Award for a previous film, "Skylarks" was completely banned by authorities. Although it was spread through underground videos, it saw no public release at all.



Results of Incident: Although Menzel and Hrabal were allowed to continue their careers, they were closely watched and would need to make compromises with censors. Eventually these difficulties led Menzel to move to theater.

The film was not released until the fall of Communism in 1990, when it saw great success at the box office.



Source: Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Ed. Derek Jones. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001.

Submitted By: NCAC

Date Input: Wednesday, August 8, 2007

Date Edited


Name: Guy de Maupassant   [ Edit ]

Date: 1851 - 1899

Location: Europe

Subject: Explicit Sexuality

Medium: Literature

Artist: Guy de Maupassant

Confronting Bodies: The Office of the Public Prosecuter of Étampes

Date of Action: 1979

Specific Location: Étampes, a community just outside of Paris

Description of Artwork: The poem, "Au Bord de l'eau" (The Water's Edge) is a tale of a love affair between and oarsman and a washerwoman who destroy themselves in pursuit of sex. Maupassant himself considers it "completely immoral and indecent in images and subject matter."



Description of Incident: The poem was published in Paris in 1876. However, it was not until 1879 that The Office of the Public Prosecutor of Étampes filed charges against Maupassant and his publisher for the offensive piece.

Maupassant was less worried about incarceration than he was about losing his position and livelihood at the Ministry of Education. He asked his friend, Gustave Flaubert, a respected Freanch author, to write a letter in his defense and get it published. In this letter, Flaubert asks why Étampes should have the poem banned while it is allowed to be published in Paris, claiming that justice in the provinces should be no different than justice in Paris. Furthermore, he states that if the authorities were to have their way and command a "monopoly of taste," great artists such as Shakespeare and Voltaire would never flourish.



Results of Incident: The charges against Maupassant were dropped due to Flaubert's defense and a lack of evidence.

Afterwards, Maupassant continued to protest censorship, even when the case was not directly aimed towards him. He became a firm believer that works of art should not be subject to change for failing to follow the standards of popular writing aimed at the general public.



Source: Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Ed. Derek Jones. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001.

Submitted By: NCAC

Date Input: Wednesday, August 8, 2007

Date Edited


Name: Painter Franciszek Kulon wins settlement in lawsuit against Sullivan County   [ Edit ]

Date: 1995 - 2005 ,2006-present

Location: North America

Subject: Nudity ,Political/Economic/Social Opinion

Medium: Painting

image description
Artist: Franciszek (Frank) C. Kulon

Confronting Bodies: The government of Sullivan County, NY

Date of Action: 2003-2007

Specific Location: Sullivan County, New York, USA

Description of Artwork: Kulon's painting depicts three nude cherubs, one draped in the American flag, dropping a hand grenade on two Iraqi children.



Description of Incident: Local officials took down Kulons painting from a gallery of 600 pieces of art in the lobby of the Sullivan County Government Center. The work was removed from the gallery due to its controversial and political message and its alleged anti-war statement.



Results of Incident:  Kulon brought a lawsuit against Sullivan County claiming that the removal of his art was censorship and a violation of his constitutional rights. In August of 2007, Kulon won at $40,000 settlement against the County. Along with winning his suit, in 2005, a group called Sullivan Peace and Justice displayed the painting beneath the spot where it once hung, while handing out peace literature. The group later presented lawmakers with a petition with 100 signatures opposing the county's decision to take it down. County officials ultimately agreed to let Kulon hang the painting, if he wanted to bring it back.



Source: http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070804/NEWS/70803017/-1/NEWS

Submitted By: NCAC

Date Input: Wednesday, August 8, 2007

Date Edited: Wednesday, August 8, 2007


Name: The assassination of Georgi Markov   [ Edit ]

Date: 1951 - 1975 ,1976 - 1984

Location: Europe

Subject: Political/Economic/Social Opinion

Medium: Literature ,Theatre ,Radio

image description
Artist: Georgi Markov

Confronting Bodies: Todor Zhivkov (president of Bulgaria) and other high ranking party members.

Date of Action: 1960's up to 1978

Specific Location: Bulgaria

Description of Artwork: In the mid 1960's he wrote several controversial novels and plays. He describes his novel, "The Great Roof" as "a symbol of the roof of lies... that the regime has constructed over our country. His play "The Assassins" deals with a scheme to kill a political leader. Much of his other work deals with similar issues



Description of Incident: In the early 1960's, Markov was a celebrated writer in Bulgaria. He had gained access to the circle of Bulgaria's literary elites and mingled with high ranking officials who enjoyed the arts. Through attending their parties he had learned many intimate secrets of high ranking party members.

In the early 60's, a roof collapsed and killed several workers. The government was slow to react and Markov to write his first novel that was critical of the regime ("The Great Roof"). By the late 60's, several of his novels and plays had been banned by the government. In 1969, his controversial play "The Man Who Was Me" was closed and Markov was warned to leave Bulgaria.

He defected to the West and was declared a traitor in Bulgaria for doing so. He continued to critique the leaders of Eastern Europe through plays he wrote while living in Britain. In the mid-70's he became a scriptwriter for the BBC and Radio Free Europe. His programs largely consisted of his memoirs, which also revealed many secrets of the high party officials he had learned about in Bulgaria, especially those of president Todor Zhivkov. In addition, he explained the way censors in Bulgaria would distort language to block work they find inappropriate.



Results of Incident: In 1977 Zhivkov signed a degree to neutralize enemy emigrants. During the next few years there were several unsuccessful attempts to assassinate Markov. Finally, in 1978, Markov was killed. He was shot in the leg with a poison pellet, launched by an agent using a modified umbrella to launch it. The evidence of the crime was removed from the Bulgarian government archives, so the case of Markov's death remain a mystery.



Source: Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Ed. Derek Jones. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001.

Submitted By: NCAC

Date Input: Wednesday, August 8, 2007

Date Edited


Name: French film commision bans Chris Marker's controversial film on Cuba under the regime of Fidel Castro   [ Edit ]

Date: 1951 - 1975

Location: Europe ,South America

Subject: Political/Economic/Social Opinion ,Religious

Medium: Film Video

Artist: Chris Marker (b. 1921 - ): French film director

Confronting Bodies: The Catholic Church; and, the French Commission de controle des films cinematographiques

Date of Action: 1960's

Specific Location: France and Cuba

Description of Artwork: Marker's film titled, "Cuba si!" ("Cuba, Yes") was shot in 1960 and early 1961, during and after the celebration of the second anniversary of the Cuban Revolution. The film is divided in two parts: the first shows Marker as a tourist-like figure who is traveling through Cuba, experiencing everyday life in the country; the second part presents an unedited look at Cuban president Fidel Castro. In the film, Castro allows Marker rare access into communist Cuba; and, in turn, Marker grants Castro the opportunity to present himself as he would like to be seen by allowing him to put his own case without editorial interference. The film is controversial for many reasons: not only does Marker provide Castro with an unprecedented opportunity to present an unbiased depiction of himself to the Western world, the film also discredits the Catholic Church's claim that Castro is a dictator by showing footage of the Spanish dictator Franciso Franco surrounded by cardinals. And, to add further to the controversial nature of the film, in a post-script Marker celebrates the defeat of the US-backed invaders by Cuban forces at the Bay of Pigs on April 15, 1961.



Description of Incident: Marker's film "Cuba si!" was called into question due to its anti-American/anti-Western message, its attack on the Catholic Church, and the free public forum it provided communist Cuba with. As a result of the film's controversial nature, on July 31, 1961 the French Commission de controle des films cinematographiques agreed to ban the film abroad as well as in France.



Results of Incident: Marker responded to the French Commission's ruling by arranging film screenings for foreign journalists and critics, in and around Paris. He also published the first of his volumes of "Commentaries", which includes texts of the commentary accompanying "Cuba si!", a selection of stills, texts of the narrative tracks of his six earlier documentaries, and copies of his correspondence with the Ministry of Information pertaining to bans on his films. The screenings Marker arranged along with illegal prints caused the film to be seen and reviewed in Germany, Scandinavia, and Britain; but it has never been publicly screened in the US



Source: Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Ed. Derek Jones. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001.

Submitted By: NCAC

Date Input: Tuesday, August 7, 2007

Date Edited: Wednesday, August 8, 2007


Name: Peter Matthiessen's book "In the Spirit of Crazy Horse" called under question by US governor and FBI officials   [ Edit ]

Date: 1951 - 1975 ,1976 - 1984 ,1985 - 1995

Location: North America

Subject: Political/Economic/Social Opinion

Medium: Literature

Artist: US novelist and essayist, Peter Matthiessen (b. 1927 - ); Viking Press; bookstores nationwide; and, Leonard Peltier

Confronting Bodies: United States FBI agent David Price and South Dakota governor William Janklow

Date of Action: 1975 through 1990

Specific Location: South Dakota, USA

Description of Artwork: Matthiessen's book, "In the Spirit of Crazy Horse" looks at the plight of the American Indian community by focusing on the case of Leonard Peltier - an American Indian tried and convicted of killing two FBI agents in June of 1975. Portraying Peltier as a martyr to a cause, Matthiessen's book suggests that he should not be blamed for the events that led to the death of two FBI agents, but rather that it is the fault of the US government. He claims that for years the US government has been hostile, abusive and unfair to the Native American communities around the country; and, it is exactly this treatment that lead to and instigated the events that transpired.



Description of Incident: On June 25, 1975, members of the militant American Indian Movement (AIM) shot and killed FBI agents Jack Coler and Ron Williams on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota. Four men were indicted for the murders; one was released, two were acquitted when a jury found that they acted in self-defense, and the fourth, a Chippewa Sioux named Leonard Peltier was convicted of the murders and sentenced to two life sentences in prison. Essayist and novelist, Peter Matthiessen strongly objected to the conviction of Peltier. And, the case inspired him to write "In the Spirit of Crazy Horse" in which he tells the story of Peltier, AIM, and the systematic oppression and inequity of Native Americans. In his book, Matthiessen argues that the killing of Coler and Williams was the result of years of the US government's unfair treatment and persecution of Native Americans, treating the AIM as domestic terrorists. According to Matthiessen, the death of the two FBI agents was the result of years of abuse inflicted onto the Native Americans. And, Matthiessen takes particular aim at South Dakota governor at the time William Janklow and FBI agent David Price. Matthiessen portrayed Janklow as a bigot and a sexual offender (Matthiessen reported, accurately, that the governor had been charged with sexual offences on two separate occasions) and the written criticized Price for his longstanding anti-AIM position. Objecting strongly to their unfavorable characterization in the book both prominent figures file libel suits against the author, the publisher Viking Press, and booksellers that were stocking the book. The suits', asking for a total of $44 million in damages, effectively repressed "In the Spirit of Crazy Horse" for eight years and is considered one of the longest, most drawn out and most expensive libel suits in publishing history.



Results of Incident: Ultimately, both cases were dismissed, but only after years of legal wrangling and millions of dollars in legal expenses. In one of the suits, the US Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit sided against Agent Price when they concluded that "[...] the Constitution requires more speech rather than less". And, in 1990 when the US Supreme Court refused to hear his appeal, Price finally settled his suit. Governor Janklow's suit was also settled in 1990 after the South Dakota Circuit and Supreme Courts dismissed it. Paltier has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Price and has been designated a political prisoner by Amnesty International, the former Soviet Union, and Desmond Tutu. Robert Redford produced a documentary about Peltier that is loosely based on Matthiessen's book. And, although Bill Clinton considered issuing a presidential pardon to Peltier before leaving office, Peltier remains in Leavenworth Federal Penitentiary.



Source: Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Ed. Derek Jones. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001.

Date Input: Tuesday, August 7, 2007

Date Edited: Wednesday, August 8, 2007


Name: Lowe-Porter's translations of Thomas Mann   [ Edit ]

Date: 1926 - 1950

Location: Europe ,North America

Subject: Explicit Sexuality ,Political/Economic/Social Opinion ,Religious

Medium: Literature

Artist: Thomas Mann

Confronting Bodies: Helen Lowe-Porter

Date of Action: Throughout the 1930's and 40's

Specific Location: N/A

Description of Artwork: Mann's work often undermined western culture's patriarchal structure of social, sexual, and spiritual premises. His novels are known for being highly symbolic and giving insight into the minds of artists.



Description of Incident: Being Jewish in Nazi Germany, Mann quickly had to shift his target audience away from Germany. He relied on the rushed English translations of Helen Lowe-Porter. Although these were suitable for establishing an audience in the English-speaking world, they were widely in accurate and often censored. Not only were metaphors destroyed through sloppy translating, but many deliberate acts of censorship also came into play. Simple but powerful statements on "idealism and socialism" were verbally toned down to being about "the social and the ideal." A huge passage where he enthusiastically describes his conversion from a monarchist to a democrat is purged completely. Even homosexual desires are rewritten to be heterosexual.



Results of Incident: Lowe-Porter's monopoly on all Mann's work lasted for 50 years. It was not until the 1990's that new English translations of Mann's work started coming into the market.



Source: Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Ed. Derek Jones. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001.

Submitted By: NCAC

Date Input: Friday, August 3, 2007

Date Edited: Tuesday, August 7, 2007


Name: The Black Envelope   [ Edit ]

Date: 1985 - 1995

Location: Europe

Subject: Political/Economic/Social Opinion

Medium: Literature

Artist: Norman Manea

Confronting Bodies: Council for Socialist Culture and Education

Date of Action: 1986

Specific Location: Romania

Description of Artwork: While Manea's writing does not criticize the leaders of the communist Romania he lived under directly, he does write about life under the regime. In "The Black Envelope," he not only writes on the negative aspects of daily life in contemporary Romania, but makes parallels to between it and Nazi Germany.



Description of Incident: When Manea submitted the novel in 1985, he was expected not only to have the work submitted to the censors, but to self-censor himself as well. When the manuscript was sent back to him, 80 percent of the text had objections written over it. Words such as "food lines" and "anti-Semitism" had been deemed unacceptable and he had basically been asked to rewrite most of the book.

After the novel had been revised and rejected several times, the publisher found a new censor to look over it. This censor demanded even more outrageous revisions. He saw the link Manea had made between Romania and Nazi Germany. He demanded an anti-fascist movement be included, even though Romania never had one. Hitler and Stalin's differences were to be clearly defined. The negative view of daily life was ordered to be eliminated. Characters on the brink of suicide would need to be changed to be more positive.



Results of Incident: Menea followed the orders of the censors and had "The Black Envelope" published. In late 1986, he emigrated to the United States. Even though he got it published, he considers "The Black Envelope" to be corrupt and now expresses a very pessimistic view of communist censorship.



Source: Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Ed. Derek Jones. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001.

Submitted By: NCAC

Date Input: Friday, August 3, 2007

Date Edited


Name: Osip Mandel'shtam's Stalin epigram   [ Edit ]

Date: 1926 - 1950

Location: Russia and Central Asia

Subject: Other ,Political/Economic/Social Opinion

Medium: Literature

Artist: Osip Mandel'shtam

Confronting Bodies: Joseph Stalin

Date of Action: 1934

Specific Location: Soviet Union

Description of Artwork: Mandel'shtam wrote a short, 16-line epigram critiszing Stalin. He wrote: "Our lives no longer feel ground under them. At ten paces you can't hear our words. But whenever there's a snatch of talk it turns to the Kremlin mountaineer, the ten thick worms his fingers, his words like measures of weight, the huge laughing cockroaches on his top lip, the glitter of his boot-rims. Ringed with a scum of chicken-necked bosses he toys with the tributes of half-men. One whistles, another meows, a third snivels. He pokes out his finger and he alone goes boom. He forges decrees in a line like horseshoes, one for the groin, one the forehead, temple, eye. He rolls the executions on his tongue like berries. He wishes he could hug them like big friends from home."

Description of Incident: Mandel'shtam shared the poem with a group of friends, one of which leaked it to the secret police. The epigram reached Stalin, declared it counter-revolutionary.



Results of Incident: Instead of destroying Mandel'shtam immediately, Stalin decided to torture him by forcing him into exile and sending him to work at Nazi camps over the next few years. During these years Mandel'shtam became depressed and tried to commit suicide several times. Eventually he started writing pro-Stalin poetry in attempts to save the lives of himself and his wife. He died in 1938, apparently due to an illness.



Source: Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Ed. Derek Jones. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001.

Submitted By: NCAC

Date Input: Thursday, August 2, 2007

Date Edited: Wednesday, August 8, 2007


Return to Main Category Page